The Case for Rick Allen's Innocence

The case against Richard Allen is riddled with flaws. From coerced confessions to questionable evidence, serious doubts remain about his guilt. These are the main reasons Richard Allen shouldn't have been convicted and sentenced to 130 years:

---

1. Coerced Confessions Under Extreme Duress

Found naked, covered in feces, and psychotic in April 2023, Allen was medicated with antipsychotics. Video evidence showed him catatonic hours after a psychiatrist claimed he was lucid, casting grave doubt on statements used to convict him.

---

2. No Forensic Evidence Linking Allen to the Crime

No DNA, fingerprints, footprints, or trace evidence from the crime scene were found on Allen, his home, or his vehicle. The prosecution's case leaned on contested witness accounts and a questionable bullet, leaving a glaring absence of concrete proof.

---

3. Disputed Ballistics Evidence

The prosecution hinged on an unspent bullet allegedly cycled through Allen’s gun, but their own expert initially couldn’t confirm a match. The defense challenged the comparison method as unreliable, and the state never sought independent verification.

---

To gain a full understanding of just how unsafe the state's case was at trial, read our complete break-down of the evidence presented.

Deep dive into the trial & evidence »